The Flint Water Crisis Litigation: Seeking Justice for Lead Contamination
In 2014, the city of Flint, Michigan, made a decision that would forever alter the lives of its residents. A switch in the city’s water source led to widespread lead contamination, sparking a public health crisis and a wave of litigation that continues to unfold today. The Flint Water Crisis serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of environmental negligence and the importance of holding responsible parties accountable. According to the U.S. government, over 9.2 million American households connect to water through lead pipes and lead service lines, highlighting the potential for similar crises in other communities.
The Genesis of the Crisis
The crisis began in April 2014 when Flint switched its water source from Lake Huron (via the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department) to the Flint River in an attempt to save money. This decision, made by a state-appointed emergency manager, proved catastrophic. The Flint River water was more corrosive than the previous source, and officials failed to add corrosion inhibitors. This caused lead from the city’s aging pipes to leach into the water supply, exposing over 100,000 residents to dangerous levels of the neurotoxin.
Residents immediately noticed problems with the water’s taste, smell, and appearance, and many reported health issues such as skin rashes and hair loss. However, their concerns were initially dismissed by officials. It wasn’t until Dr. Mona Hanna-Attisha released her report on elevated blood lead levels in Flint children in September 2015 that the severity of the crisis gained widespread attention. Before the switch, the elevated blood lead level (EBLL) of children in Flint was 2.4%; after the switch, it rose to 4.9%. Even doses as low as 5 micrograms can cause lasting physiological and neurological harm to children.
The Legal Battle Begins
Litigation began in 2015, with numerous cases filed in both federal and state courts, including class actions and individual lawsuits involving thousands of plaintiffs. These lawsuits sought to hold various parties accountable, including:
- The State of Michigan and its officials: For their role in the decision to switch water sources and their failure to properly treat the water.
- The City of Flint and its officials: For their negligence in maintaining the city’s water infrastructure and their initial denial of the problem.
- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): For failing to adequately oversee the state’s handling of the crisis.
- Private engineering companies (Veolia North America and Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam (LAN)): For allegedly providing negligent advice and failing to warn of the risks of lead contamination.
Plaintiffs—who include children, adults, property owners, and business owners—allege that they were exposed to lead, legionella, and other contaminants from the municipal water supply.
Key Legal Developments and Settlements
The Flint Water Crisis litigation has been complex and has involved numerous legal challenges. Some key developments include:
- Class Action Certification: A significant step in the litigation was the certification of a class action, allowing the claims of thousands of Flint residents to be consolidated into a single case.
- Governmental Immunity: A major obstacle in the litigation was governmental immunity, which generally protects government agencies from lawsuits. However, plaintiffs argued that the government’s actions in this case were so egregious that they should not be shielded from liability.
- Partial Settlements: Several partial settlements have been reached with various defendants. In November 2021, a landmark $626.25 million settlement was approved, resolving claims against the State of Michigan and other governmental defendants. This settlement provided compensation to Flint residents for their injuries and losses.
- Settlements with Engineering Firms: In 2024, settlements were reached with the private engineering firms Veolia North America and Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam (LAN). On May 22, 2024, Judge Levy granted final approval to the $8 million settlement against LAN for failing to warn Flint residents of the likelihood of lead contamination in their drinking water. Then on October 3, 2024, she granted final approval of a $25 million settlement with Veolia, bringing total settlements thus far to $659.25 million.
The Impact on Flint Residents
The Flint Water Crisis has had a devastating impact on the health and well-being of Flint residents. Lead exposure can cause a range of health problems, particularly in children, including:
- Neurological damage: Lead can damage the brain and nervous system, leading to learning disabilities, behavioral problems, and decreased cognitive function.
- Developmental delays: Lead exposure can interfere with a child’s physical and mental development.
- Other health problems: Lead can also cause kidney damage, high blood pressure, and reproductive problems.
In addition to the physical health effects, the Flint Water Crisis has also taken a significant toll on the mental health of residents. Studies have shown high rates of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety among Flint residents. A study conducted between 2019 and 2020, for example, estimated that one in five Flint adults may have experienced major depression, and one in four may have had PTSD in the year before the study. The psychological damage caused by the water crisis still needs to be addressed.
The Road to Recovery and Prevention
While the legal battles continue, efforts are underway to help Flint recover from the crisis and prevent similar incidents from happening in other communities. These efforts include:
- Infrastructure improvements: Replacing lead pipes and upgrading water treatment facilities. After $400 million in state and federal spending, Flint has secured a clean water source, distributed filters to all who want them, and laid modern, safe, copper pipes to nearly every home in the city.
- Health monitoring and treatment: Providing medical care and monitoring for residents who were exposed to lead.
- Mental health services: Offering counseling and support services to help residents cope with the trauma of the crisis.
- Strengthening regulations: Revising and strengthening federal and state regulations to protect drinking water quality. In 2018, Michigan finalized revisions to the MI LCR with the following significant changes: Removal of all LSLs in the state at a rate of 5 percent per year, giving water systems twenty years and Water systems are required to pay for this.
Lessons Learned and the Path Forward
The Flint Water Crisis serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of:
- Prioritizing public health: Government officials must prioritize the health and safety of their constituents above cost-cutting measures.
- Ensuring transparency and accountability: Government agencies must be transparent in their decision-making processes and accountable for their actions.
- Investing in infrastructure: Maintaining and upgrading water infrastructure is essential to providing safe drinking water.
- Listening to the community: Government officials must listen to the concerns of residents and take their complaints seriously.
The Flint Water Crisis litigation is a complex and ongoing process. While settlements have been reached with some defendants, other cases remain pending. The outcome of these cases will have significant implications for the victims of the crisis and for the future of environmental justice in the United States.
Have you or a loved one been affected by lead contamination in your drinking water?
Contact our firm today for a free consultation. Our experienced attorneys can help you understand your legal rights and options.