Roundup Lawsuits: Understanding the Ongoing Litigation for Herbicide Injuries in the 2010s and Beyond
Did you know that exposure to glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup, has been linked to an increased risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by as much as 41%? This alarming statistic underscores the gravity of the Roundup lawsuits that have been making headlines since the 2010s, representing a significant chapter in the history of product liability and corporate responsibility.
This blog post delves into the complex world of Roundup litigation, exploring the key issues, legal battles, and potential implications for individuals who have suffered injuries due to herbicide exposure. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the ongoing legal landscape, offering insights into the science, the lawsuits, and the fight for justice.
The Rise of Roundup Lawsuits in the 2010s
The widespread use of Roundup, a glyphosate-based herbicide, made it a household name for weed control. However, mounting scientific evidence began to suggest a link between glyphosate exposure and serious health risks, particularly non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). In 2015, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified glyphosate as “probably carcinogenic to humans,” which acted as a catalyst, sparking a wave of lawsuits against Monsanto, the original manufacturer of Roundup. Bayer acquired Monsanto in 2018 and inherited all the ongoing litigation.
These lawsuits, filed throughout the 2010s and continuing today, allege that Monsanto knew about the risks associated with Roundup but failed to warn consumers. Plaintiffs claim that their exposure to Roundup caused them to develop NHL and other cancers, seeking compensation for medical expenses, pain, suffering, and other damages.
Key Legal Battles and Outcomes
The Roundup litigation has been marked by several high-profile cases that have shaped the legal landscape:
- Dewayne “Lee” Johnson Case (2018): This was the first Roundup cancer case to go to trial. Johnson, a groundskeeper diagnosed with NHL, alleged his cancer was caused by Roundup exposure. The jury sided with Johnson, awarding him significant damages, setting a precedent for future cases. Initially, he was awarded $289 million, which was later reduced to $78 million and then $21 million.
- Pilliod Case (2019): Another significant verdict came in the Pilliod case, where a jury awarded over \$2 billion to a couple who claimed their NHL was caused by Roundup.
- McKivison Case (2023): A Pennsylvania jury awarded John McKivison a $2.25 billion verdict after he claimed Roundup caused his non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
These cases, among others, have resulted in billions of dollars in settlements and verdicts against Monsanto/Bayer. As of October 2024, Monsanto has reached settlement agreements in nearly 100,000 Roundup lawsuits and has paid approximately $11 billion.
The Science Behind the Lawsuits: Glyphosate and Cancer
At the heart of the Roundup lawsuits lies the scientific evidence linking glyphosate to cancer. Studies have shown a correlation between glyphosate exposure and an increased risk of NHL and other cancers.
- A 2019 meta-analysis found that exposure to glyphosate increases the risk of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma by 41%.
- Research published in the journal Leukemia & Lymphoma in 2023 found a strong statistical correlation between glyphosate and several types of cancers, including non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and hairy cell leukemia.
- A systematic review of 175 scientific studies published in 2023 supported the IARC’s classification of glyphosate as a “probable human carcinogen.”
Despite these findings, Bayer maintains that Roundup is safe and that glyphosate does not cause cancer. The company cites scientific evidence and regulatory assessments that support its stance. This ongoing debate underscores the complexity of the scientific issues at play in the Roundup litigation.
Current Status of Roundup Lawsuits
While Bayer has settled a significant number of Roundup claims, the litigation is far from over. As of February 2025, there are still an estimated 54,000 active Roundup lawsuits pending. Most lawsuits have been filed in state court, but over 4,000 claims in the MDL Roundup class action lawsuit are still pending in California. New Roundup lawsuits continue to be filed regularly.
Bayer faces ongoing legal challenges and continues to defend itself in court. The company is also pursuing strategies to limit its liability in future cases, including seeking clarity from the U.S. Supreme Court and backing legislation that would prevent failure-to-warn claims.
Who Is Affected and How to Seek Legal Help
The Roundup lawsuits primarily affect individuals who have been exposed to Roundup and have developed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma or other related cancers. Those at higher risk include:
- Farmers and agricultural workers
- Gardeners
- Landscapers and lawn care professionals
- Groundskeepers and maintenance workers
- Herbicide technicians
If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with cancer after exposure to Roundup, it is crucial to seek legal help. An experienced Roundup lawyer can evaluate your case, explain your legal options, and help you pursue compensation for your injuries.
Navigating the Complexities of Roundup Litigation
The Roundup lawsuits are a complex and evolving area of law. Understanding the key issues, legal battles, and scientific evidence is essential for anyone affected by this litigation. If you believe you have a claim, it is important to consult with a qualified attorney who can guide you through the legal process and fight for your rights.
Disclaimer: This blog post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. If you have been injured due to Roundup exposure, you should consult with an attorney to discuss your specific legal situation.